Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of confirmatory factor analysis: Comparison of goodness-of-fit indexes among Model 1 (five-factor) and Model 2 (three-factor) (n = 106a)

From: Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery in community mental health service users in Japan

Model

GFI

AGFI

CFI

RMSEA

AIC

χ2

df

p

Five-factor modelb

0.83

0.77

0.94

0.07

348.01

242.01

157

<  0.001

Three-factor modelc

0.81

0.75

0.93

0.08

362.19

272.19

165

< 0.001

  1. GFI Goodness of Fit Index, AGFI Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index, CFI Comparative Fit Index, RMSEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, AIC Akaike Information Criterion for model. aRespondents that answered ‘Yes’ to all 20 items in support sub-scale. bmodel defined based on theoretical notion in the previous study. cmodel defined by Exploratory item factor analysis in this study.