Skip to main content

Table 4 Hierarchical multiple regression analyses predicting the quality of the therapeutic alliance and interactional problems

From: Theory of mind, emotion recognition, delusions and the quality of the therapeutic relationship in patients with psychosis – a secondary analysis of a randomized-controlled therapy trial

Predictors

B

t

p

F / F Change

df

p

Adjusted R2 / R2change

Regression 1: TSQ therapist alliance 1

 Step 1 **

   

7.741

3168

< .0001

.106

  PANSS total (covariate)

.011

.144

.886

    

  Emotion Recognition**

.339

4.643

< .0001

    

  PSYRATS delusional frequency

−.110

−1.399

.164

    

 Step 2 **

   

7.406

1167

.007

.037

  PANSS total (covariate)

−.018

−.230

.818

    

  Emotion Recognition **

.288

3.881

< .0001

    

  PSYRATS delusional frequency

−.057

−.715

.475

    

Interaction**:

.205

2.721

.007

    

Regression 2: TSQ interactional problems 1

 Step 1 **

   

7.741

3168

< .0001

.106

  PANSS total (covariate)**

.221

2.911

.004

    

  Emotion Recognition **

−.252

−3.565

<.0001

    

  PSYRATS delusional frequency*

.176

2.316

.022

    

 Step 2 **

   

7.406

1167

.007

.139

  PANSS total (covariate)**

.244

3.207

.002

    

  Emotion Recognition**

−.213

−2.942

.004

    

  PSYRATS delusional frequency

−.135

1.749

.0982

    

Interaction*

−.156

−2.125

.035

    
  1. Notes: TSQ Therapist Session questionnaire, PANSS Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, PSYRATS Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale; 1: 174 patients participated at least three sessions and the quality of the therapeutic relationship was rated by their therapists (n = 13); *: p < .05; **: p < .01