Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review

From: Validated screening tools to identify common mental disorders in perinatal and postpartum women in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study Setting; rural/urban Study design Sample Condition Screening tool Diagnostic interview Language Optimal cut-off Sens Spec Prevalence1 Other
Benjamin (2005) Tamil Nadu (South); rural CS 129 post-partum women Depression EPDS CIS-R Tamil ≥9 94.1% 90.2% 13.2% AUC 0.921
At cut-off ≥13: sens 64.7%; spec 96.4%
Desai (2011) Gujarat (West); mixed CS 200 post-partum women (0–12 months) Depression EPDS Psychiatrist interview Gujarati ≥11 100% 98% 12.5% AUC 0.999; PPV 89.3; NPV 100
At cut-off ≥13:
sens 84%; spec 100%
Fernandes (2011) Karnataka (Southwest); rural CS 194 pregnant women (3rd trimester) Depression EPDS
K10
MINI-Plus Kannada EPDS: ≥13
K10: ≥6
EPDS: 100%
K10: 100%
EPDS: 84.9%
K10:
81.3%
14.3% EPDS: AUC 0.95 (95% CI 0.92–0.97); PPV 52.0; NPV 99.0
K10: AUC 0.95 (95% CI 0.92–0.98); PPV 48.0; NPV 99.0
Joshi (2020) Madhya Pradesh (central); mixed CS 100 pregnant women (12–36 weeks) Depression EPDS PHQ-9 Hindi ≥10 65.4% 79.7% AUC 0.7346 (95% CI 0.562–0.796)
At cut-off ≥13:
sens 78.6%; spec 75.6%
Kalita (2008) Assam (Northeast); mixed CS 100 post-partum women (6 weeks) Depression EPDS ICD-10 criteria Assamese ≥13 88.9% 85.4% 18% AUC NR; PPV 57.14;
NPV 97.22
Khapre (2017) Maharashtra (West); rural CS 280 post-partum women (6 weeks to 6 months) Depression EPDS Semi-structured interview Marathi ≥13 93.8% 94.9% AUC 0.968
(95% CI 0.947–0.989)
At cut-off ≥13:
sens 93.8%; spec 94.9%
Patel (2002) Goa (West); NR CS NR Depression EPDS CIS-R Konkani 11 or 12 92% 85% AUC NR
  1. Abbreviations: AUC area under the receiver operating curve, CI confidence interval, CIS-R Clinical Interview Schedule (Revised), CS cross sectional, EPDS Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, ICD-10 International Classification of Diseases (10th revision), K10 Kessler-10, MINI Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, NPV negative predictive value, NR not reported, PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PPV positive predictive value, Sens sensitivity, Spec specificity. 1Prevalence determined using diagnostic interview
\