Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the cost-effectiveness analyses

From: Cost-effectiveness of a stepped care program to prevent depression among primary care patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and/or coronary heart disease and subthreshold depression in comparison with usual care

Outcome

Mean cost difference (95% CI)

Mean effect difference (95% CI)

ICER

Distribution of the Cost-Effectiveness plane (%)

North-East

South-East

South-West

North-West

Main analysesa

 Cases of major depression prevented

€1125

(€-2942; €5343)

−0.024 (− 0.118; 0.070)

−46,802

19%

11%

21%

49%

 QALYs (EQ-5D)

€919

(€-3133; €5145)

0.010 (−0.0269; 0.0474)

88,898

41%

30%

5%

24%

 Severity of depressive symptoms (PHQ-9)

€923

(€-3151; €5073)

0.077 (−1.546; 1.701)

11,927

32%

23%

12%

33%

 Perceived recovery

€1125

(€-2987; €5343)

0.011 (−0.156; 0.177)

107,353

38%

17%

14%

31%

Sensitivity analyses 1: Crude analysesb

 Cases of major depression prevented

€ 1001

(€-3543; €5852)

−0.018 (− 0.113; 0.077)

−55,779

20%

16%

20%

44%

 QALYs (EQ-5D)

€ 1001

(€-3547; €5780)

0.001 (−0.457; 0.479)

939,235

26%

26%

9%

36%

 Severity of depressive symptoms (PHQ-9)

€ 1001

(€-3577; €5797)

0.096 (−1.646; 1.454)

10,429

32%

23%

12%

33%

 Perceived recovery

€ 1001

(€-3540; €5800)

−0.027 (− 0.162; 0.156)

− 373,720

32%

17%

19%

32%

Sensitivity analyses 2: analyses from NHS perspectivec

 Cases of major depression prevented

€1422

(€-578; 3167)

−0.024 (− 0.118; 0.070)

−58,733

27%

3%

5%

65%

 QALYs (EQ-5D)

€1369

(€-590; 3110)

0.010 (−0.0274; 0.0469)

140,088

60%

8%

2%

30%

 Severity of depressive symptoms (PHQ-9)

€1398

(€-596; 3154)

0.077 (−1.541; 1.695)

18,174

49%

6%

3%

42%

 Perceived recovery

€1422

(€-541; 3173)

0.0126 (−0.153; 0.179)

112,624

53%

4%

4%

39%

  1. CI Confidence Interval; MINI Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview; EQ-5D-5L EuroQo-5Dimensions 5 Levels; PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnarie-9; NHS National Health Service (United Kingdom)
  2. a Costs from a societal perspective are analyzed. All analyses are corrected for baseline values of costs from a societal perspective and the effect, gender, age and other possible confounders: marital status, employment status, level of education, co-existence of DM2 and CHD, alcohol use, number of depressive episodes in history and age of onset of depression
  3. b Costs from a societal perspective are analyzed. The analyses are not corrected for baseline values of costs and effects, nor for possible confounders
  4. c Costs from a NHS perspective are analyzed. All analyses are corrected for baseline values of costs from NHS perspective and the effect, gender, age and other possible confounders: marital status, employment status, level of education, co-existence of DM2 and CHD, alcohol use, number of depressive episodes in history and age of onset of depression