Skip to main content

Table 2 Post-hoc Analyses: Intervention Features

From: Efficacy of web-based self-management interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Aspects of intervention

Subgroup classification

Studies

Sample size (intervention/control)

Meta-analysis

Heterogeneity

Between groups tests

Hedges’ g

95% CI

Q

p

I2

Q

p

Intervention theory

CBT

9

617/645

−0.39

−0.58,-0.21

19.42

0.01

58.80%

  

CBT + other therapies

5

371/406

−0.44

−0.69,-0.19

10.38

0.03

61.47%

  

PST

3

284/294

−0.47

−1.17,0.24

29.64

0.00

93.25%

0.12

0.94

Intervention time

t ≤ 6w

5

173/217

−0.26

− 0.51,-0.02

5.68

0.22

29.62%

  

6w<t ≤ 8w

7

684/709

−0.33

−0.59.-0.08

33.37

0.00

82.02%

  

t > 8w

6

461/465

−0.73

−0.95,-0.50

12.69

0.03

60.61%

8.85

0.01

Guidance

Therapist guidance group

12

869/909

−0.60

−0.81,-0.38

50.93

0.00

78.40%

  

non-therapist guidance group

3

255/263

−0.17

−0.40,0.06

3.21

0.20

37.65%

  

Virtual health indicator guidance group

2

174/183

−0.27

−0.58,0.05

2.29

0.13

56.30%

7.49

0.02

Adherence to the interventions

≤ 90%

15

1118/1192

−0.35

−0.49,-0.21

36.26

0.00

61.97%

  

> 90%

3

200/199

−0.97

−1.17,-0.76

1.06

0.59

0.00%

23.60

0.00

  1. Note. CBT cognitive behavioral therapy, PST problem-solving treatment