| | WLSMVχ2 | df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA(90%CI) |
|---|
Model A | 886.139 | 169 | 0.921 | 0.911 | 0.102(0.096, 0.109) |
Model B | 526.342 | 167 | 0.960 | 0.955 | 0.073(0.066, 0.080) |
Model C | 803.954 | 167 | 0.930 | 0.920 | 0.097(0.090, 0.104) |
Model D | 505.707 | 164 | 0.962 | 0.956 | 0.072(0.065, 0.079) |
Model E | 502.089 | 160 | 0.962 | 0.955 | 0.072(0.065, 0.080) |
Model F | 683.346 | 160 | 0.942 | 0.931 | 0.090(0.083, 0.097) |
- Note. WLSMV Weighted least squares with mean and variance adjustment, df Degree of freedom, TLI Tucker-Lewis index, CFI Comparative fifit index, RMSEA Root mean square error of approximation; Model A: Radloff’s original four-factor model; Model B: two-factor model in which all negative items were combined into an independent factor and the remaining four positive items formed a second factor; Model C:three-factor model with depressed affect, positive affect and interpersonal problems; Model D: another three-factor model proposed by Wang et al. with depressed affect, positive affect and somatic complaints; Model E: five-factor model in Kim’s meta-analysis; Model F: another five-factor model in Kim’s meta-analysis
