From: Preferences of psychotherapists for blended care in Germany: a discrete choice experiment
Respondent characteristics (n = 200) | Experiences and expectations regarding BC | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mean age in years | 48 | Experience with BC format in therapy | |
Female | 43% | Yes | 26.5% |
Therapeutic orientation | No | 73.5% | |
Behavioral | 52.5% | Evaluation of previous experience with BC | |
Psychodynamic or analytic | 39% | Excellent | 7.5% |
Behavioral and psychodynamic or analytic | 3% | Satisfied | 54.7% |
Systemic | 1% | Neither good nor bad | 32.1% |
Humanistic | 0.5% | Bad | 5.7% |
Another | 4% | Very bad | 0% |
Professional background | Willing to use BC in the future | ||
Psychological psychotherapist | 1.5% | Yes | 90.5% |
Medical psychotherapist | 89% | No | 8.5% |
Child and adolescent psychotherapist | 1% | Preferred timing of BC application | |
Alternative practitioner for psychotherapy | 0% | Stepped care before in-person treatment | 9% |
Psychiatrist | 3.5% | Integrated parallel BC | 68.5% |
Psychiatrist and psychotherapist | 3.5% | After in-person treatment | 22.5% |
General practitioner | 1% | Perceived main advantage of BC | |
Neurologist | 0.5% | Time savings for therapists and patients | 22.2% |
Main place of work | Patient empowerment | 21.3% | |
Own outpatient practice | 33% | Increase in treatment efficacy | 15% |
Clinic/hospital | 55% | Flexibility for therapists and patients | 7.5% |
Other | 12% | Larger patient group can be reached | 6.7% |
Satisfaction with monthly income | Bridging waiting times for therapy | 4.6% | |
Highly satisfied | 8% | Perceived main risk of BC | |
Satisfied | 60.5% | Lack of personal support for patient | 26.1% |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 20% | Deterioration of therapeutic alliance | 17.4% |
Dissatisfied | 10% | Misinterpretation and treatment errors | 23.1% |
Very dissatisfied | 1.5% | Overburdening patient compliance | 9.3% |
Privacy risks | 7.7% | ||
Low level of customization | 6.7% | ||
Lack of therapeutic effectiveness | 5.6% |