Skip to main content

Table 3 DCE results based on a mixed logit model

From: Preferences of psychotherapists for blended care in Germany: a discrete choice experiment

  Preference estimates Marginal effect
Attributes and levels Coefficient 95% CI SD 95% CI of SD  
Recommendation
 None Reference     Reference
 Colleagues 1.30 [0.94,1.65] 1.46 [0.97,1.96] 12.2%
 Professional societies 2.70 [2.12,3.27] 2.45 [1.78,3.11] 25.7%
Effectiveness (linear) 1.08 [0.85,1.30] 1.02 [0.73,1.30]  
 8 of 10 vs. 7 of 10      10.7%
 9 of 10 vs. 7 of 10      21.0%
Face to face vs. online 0.03 [0.01,0.04] 0.09 [0.07,0.11]  
 50:50 vs. 20:80      7.4%
 80:20 vs. 20:80      14.2%
Reimbursement
 Proportional to time Reference     Reference
 Time + lump sum 0.95 [0.66,1.23] 1.33 [1.02,1.63] 9.5%
ASC −0.32 [−1.33,0.69] 1.37 [0.59,2.15]  
ASC x block2 0.05 [−0.97,1.08] 1.39 [0.51,2.27]  
ASC x block3 0.29 [−0.70,1.29] 1.63 [0.58,2.67]  
Log likelihood −1568     
AIC 3223     
BIC 3521     
Respondents 200     
Observations 6400     
  1. Note. Attributes were dummy coded. Coefficients refer to the mean preference estimates and standard deviations (SD) of the distribution around the means. Uncertainty around the mean and SDs is shown using 95% confidence intervals (CIs)