Skip to main content

Table 3 DCE results based on a mixed logit model

From: Preferences of psychotherapists for blended care in Germany: a discrete choice experiment

 

Preference estimates

Marginal effect

Attributes and levels

Coefficient

95% CI

SD

95% CI of SD

 

Recommendation

 None

Reference

   

Reference

 Colleagues

1.30

[0.94,1.65]

1.46

[0.97,1.96]

12.2%

 Professional societies

2.70

[2.12,3.27]

2.45

[1.78,3.11]

25.7%

Effectiveness (linear)

1.08

[0.85,1.30]

1.02

[0.73,1.30]

 

 8 of 10 vs. 7 of 10

    

10.7%

 9 of 10 vs. 7 of 10

    

21.0%

Face to face vs. online

0.03

[0.01,0.04]

0.09

[0.07,0.11]

 

 50:50 vs. 20:80

    

7.4%

 80:20 vs. 20:80

    

14.2%

Reimbursement

 Proportional to time

Reference

   

Reference

 Time + lump sum

0.95

[0.66,1.23]

1.33

[1.02,1.63]

9.5%

ASC

−0.32

[−1.33,0.69]

1.37

[0.59,2.15]

 

ASC x block2

0.05

[−0.97,1.08]

1.39

[0.51,2.27]

 

ASC x block3

0.29

[−0.70,1.29]

1.63

[0.58,2.67]

 

Log likelihood

−1568

    

AIC

3223

    

BIC

3521

    

Respondents

200

    

Observations

6400

    
  1. Note. Attributes were dummy coded. Coefficients refer to the mean preference estimates and standard deviations (SD) of the distribution around the means. Uncertainty around the mean and SDs is shown using 95% confidence intervals (CIs)