Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the sample, by study arm (N = 256)

From: Impact on routine psychiatric diagnostic practice from implementing the DSM-5 cultural formulation interview: a pragmatic RCT in Sweden

 

Intervention

(CFI)

N134 (%)

Usual care (UC)

N122(%)

Total

N256(%)

Sex:

 Women

86(64.2)

73(59.8)

159(62.1)

 Men

47(35.1)

49(40.2)

96(37.5)

 Missing

1(.7)

.

1(.4)

Age group:

 17-24

37(27.6)

32(26.2)

69(27.0)

 25-34

34(25.4)

40(32.8)

74(28.9)

 35-44

24(17.9)

25(20.5)

49(19.1)

 45-64

38(28.4)

24(19.7)

62(24.2)

 Missing

1(.7)

1(.8)

2(.7)

Employment group:

 Employed

58(43.3)

55(45.1)

113(44.1)

 Not employed

31(23.1)

36(29.5)

67(26.2)

 Welfare benefits

40(29.9)

28(23.0)

68(26.6)

 Missing

5(3.7)

3(2.5)

8(3.1)

Educational level:

 Elementary school or lower

25(18.7)

39(32.0)

64(25.0)

 College

28(20.9)

22(18.0)

50(19.5)

 Senior high school

53(39.6)

41(33.6)

94(36.7)

 Missing

28(20.9)

20(16.4)

48(18.8)

Referral diagnosis:

 Suspicion of psychiatric diagnoses

91(67.9)

94(77.0)

185(72.3)

 Generic problem description

35(26.1)

27(22.1)

62(24.2)

 No indication

8(6.0)

1(.8)

9(3.5)

Referring agency:

 Voluntary admission

29(21.6)

36(29.5)

65(25.4)

 Referral from primary care clinics

69(51.5)

52(42.6)

121(47.3)

 Referral from other caregivers

28(20.9)

34(27.9)

62(24.2)

 Missing

8(6.0)

.

8(3.1)

Country of origina

 Middle east

15(11.2)

14(11.5)

29(11.3)

 Other European countries

16(11.9)

9(7.4)

25(9.8)

 Sweden or other Nordic countries

85(63.4)

73(59.8)

158(61.7)

 Other

12(9.0)

15(12.3)

27(10.5)

 Missing

6(4.5)

11(9.0)

17(6.6)

Mother tongue:

 Swedish

70(52.2)

68(55.7)

138(53.9)

 Non-Swedish

57(42.5)

46(37.7)

103(40.2)

 Missing

7(5.2)

8(6.6)

15(5.9)

Number of years in Sweden (when country of origin not Sweden):

M (SD)

17.8 (11.1)

M (SD)

16.9 (10.3)

17.35(10.6)