Skip to main content

Table 7 Rights, inclusion and citizenship outcomes

From: Interventions to improve social circumstances of people with mental health conditions: a rapid evidence synthesis

Mental health diagnoses

Author

Intervention vs Control

Outcomes

Inclusion

Mixed mental health conditions

Salzer 2016

(USA, N = 100) [136]

Peer-delivered core services of Centres for Independent Living (CILs) vs TAU

There were no differences between the CIL and control condition over time on total number of participation days F (92,172) = 1.86, P = .16)

SMI

Segal 2010

(USA, N = 505) [137]

Self-help agencies and community mental health agency services, vs community mental health agency services (CMHA) only

Combined self-help agencies and community mental health services were significantly better able to promote recovery of client-members than CMHA services alone. The combined intervention sample showed greater improvements in independent social integration (social presence, access, participation, production, employment and consumption behaviours) (F = 12.13, df = 3 and 491, P < .001)

Difficulties with access to services

Mixed mental health conditions

Salzer 2016

(USA, N = 100) [136]

Peer-delivered core services of Centres for Independent Living (CILs) vs TAU

Time x Group interactions in repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant differences between the intervention and control condition over time on total number of unmet needs (F(2, 172) = 1.60, P = 0.21)

  1. N Number of participants, TAU Treatment as usual