Table 2 Average score and inter-rater reliability per item of the ART monitor (N = 15)
Item | Average score (SD) | Exact Agreement | Agreement allowing 1-point difference |
|---|---|---|---|
Team structure | |||
1. Caseloada | 3.27 (1.64) | 66.7% | - |
2. Team composition | 2.77 (1.14) | 26.7% | 86.7% |
3. Peer worker and family peer worker | 1.37 (0.67) | 80.0% | 100.0% |
4. Nurses | 3.87 (1.14) | 53.3% | 66.7% |
5. Nurse practitioner | 2.70 (1.66) | 53.3% | 86.7% |
6. Social workers/residential support worker | 3.27 (1.80) | 73.3% | 100.0% |
7. Occupational therapist | 1.37 (0.77) | 86.7% | 93.3% |
8. Psychiatristb | 3.87 (1.39) | 73.3% | 100.0% |
9. Health care psychologist/behavioral specialist | 2.97 (1.85) | 73.3% | 80.0% |
10. Extra disciplines | 3.17 (1.05) | 53.3% | 100.0% |
Team process | |||
11. Vision and working methoda | 2.53 (1.01) | 66.7% | - |
12. Community participation | 2.27 (1.08) | 33.3% | 86.7% |
13. Hospitality and presence | 3.43 (0.73) | 46.7% | 93.3% |
14. Attitude of staff | 2.60 (0.81) | 60.0% | 86.7% |
15. Active recoverya | 2.53 (0.86) | 66.7% | - |
16. Working in the triada | 3.07 (0.37) | 93.3% | - |
Recovery-oriented care and support | |||
17. Intake | 2.23 (0.84) | 26.7% | 73.3% |
18. Care coordination meeting (CCM) | 2.40 (1.19) | 46.7% | 86.7% |
19. Revitalize or build resource group | 2.33 (0.84) | 33.3% | 73.3% |
20. Introduce recoverya | 2.67 (1.06) | 66.7% | - |
21. Needs, strengths, and wishes | 2.73 (1.02) | 46.7% | 80.0% |
22. Integrated treatment and recovery plan | 3.00 (0.91) | 26.7% | 80.0% |
23. Recovery interventions at four levelsa | 2.40 (1.30) | 80.0% | - |
24. Systematic risk assessment | 2.07 (1.11) | 20.0% | 80.0% |
25. Early warning sign plana | 3.03 (1.13) | 46.7% | - |
26. Digital whiteboard | 1.77 (1.31) | 80.0% | 93.3% |
27. Rooming ina | 2.20 (1.13) | 73.3% | - |
28. Stepped care | 2.87 (1.07) | 33.3% | 86.7% |
29. Recovery assessmenta | 2.13 (1.36) | 66.7% | - |
Other principles of recovery-oriented care and support | |||
30. Mental health care standards | 2.37 (0.81) | 46.7% | 73.3% |
31. Somatic carea | 3.87 (1.14) | 53.3% | - |
32. Medication policy | 3.80 (0.81) | 20.0% | 86.7% |
33. Dual diagnosis | 1.73 (0.91) | 60.0% | 80.0% |
Organization of care | |||
34. Cooperation with FACT and other outpatient care teamsa | 1.27 (0.87) | 80.0% | - |
35. Admission and discharge | 2.37 (1.19) | 40.0% | 73.3% |
36. Care process and consultation | 2.27 (1.53) | 73.3% | 80.0% |
37. Waiting list | 2.47 (1.50) | 53.3% | 80.0% |
38. Reachability | 4.03 (1.19) | 26.7% | 73.3% |
39. Regional teamsa | 1.63 (0.93) | 73.3% | - |
40. ART-improvement curve | 2.17 (1.44) | 60.0% | 80.0% |
Professionalization | |||
41. Reflectiona | 2.13 (1.46) | 66.7% | - |
42. Training and education | 2.13 (0.86) | 26.7% | 60.0% |
43. Knowledge of regional networka | 2.60 (1.22) | 66.7% | - |
44. Team spirit | 3.40 (0.93) | 46.7% | 86.7% |
Healing environment | |||
45. Healthy living environment | 1.93 (1.02) | 53.3% | 93.3% |
46. Housing firsta | 1.77 (1.28) | 46.7% | - |
47. Housing conditions | 2.63 (1.00) | 26.7% | 80.0% |
Safety | |||
48. Safety management system | 4.47 (0.73) | 60.0% | 86.7% |
49. Conflict management and personal safetya | 4.20 (1.35) | 60.0% | - |
50. Cooperation agreements on safety | 3.23 (1.38) | 40.0% | 80.0% |
Reduction of coercion | |||
51. Evaluation of coercive measures | 3.03 (1.50) | 33.3% | 53.3% |