Skip to main content

Table 1 Sociodemographic and other characteristics of the participants (N = 335)

From: Emotion regulation and drunkorexia behaviors among Lebanese adults: the indirect effects of positive and negative metacognition

Variable

N (%)

Gender

 Male

176 (52.5%)

 Female

159 (47.5%)

Marital status

 Single

187 (55.8%)

 Married

148 (44.2%)

Religion

 Christian

193 (57.6%)

 Muslim

94 (28.1%)

 Druze

48 (14.3%)

Education level

 Secondary or less

56 (16.7%)

 University

279 (83.3%)

Problematic alcohol use (PAU)

 Low PAU (AUDIT scores of 7 or less)

232 (69.3%)

 High PAU (AUDIT scores of 8 or more)

103 (30.7%)

 

Mean ± SD

Age (in years)

32.16 ± 11.09

Number of children

0.95 ± 1.17

Physical activity index

27.81 ± 20.22

Household crowding index

0.97 ± 0.40

Body mass index (kg/m2)

24.16 ± 3.90

Drunkorexia behaviors

10.93 ± 8.87

Cognitive reappraisal

30.21 ± 7.79

Expressive suppression

18.18 ± 5.92

Positive metacognition beliefs about emotional self-regulation

19.24 ± 6.40

Positive metacognitive beliefs about cognitive self-regulation

7.29 ± 2.86

Negative metacognitive beliefs about the uncontrollability of drinking

4.24 ± 1.99

Negative metacognitive beliefs about cognitive harm due to drinking

5.22 ± 2.38