Skip to main content

Table 2 Bivariate analysis of continuous variables associated with drunkorexia behaviors

From: Emotion regulation and drunkorexia behaviors among Lebanese adults: the indirect effects of positive and negative metacognition

Variable

DB

Age

NC

PAI

HCI

BMI

CR

ES

PAMS1

PAMS2

NAMS1

NAMS2

Drunkorexic behaviors (DB)

1

           

Age

.16**

1

          

Number of children (NC)

.01

.68***

1

         

Physical activity index (PAI)

.25***

-.15**

-.13*

         

Household crowding index (HCI)

.02

-.08

.03

.02

1

       

Body mass index (BMI)

.04

.32***

.24***

-.04

-.08

1

      

Cognitive reappraisal (CR)

.25***

.20***

.08

.05

-.04

.04

1

     

Expressive suppression (ES)

.33***

.06

-.05

.12*

.09

.08

.55***

1

    

PAMS1

.08

.11*

.01

-.23***

.04

.11

.21***

.13*

1

   

PAMS 2

.26***

.06

-.02

-.07

.12*

.01

.19**

.29***

.63***

1

  

NAMS 1

.35***

.07

-.05

.01

.24***

.06

.04

.20***

.36***

.41***

1

 

NAMS 2

.29***

.13*

.06

.02

.10

.04

.03

.12*

.18**

.21***

.48***

1

  1. R Pearson correlation coefficient, ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05; PAMS1 Positive metacognition beliefs about emotional self-regulation, PAMS2 Positive metacognitive beliefs about cognitive self-regulation, NAMS1 Negative metacognitive beliefs about the uncontrollability of drinking, NAMS2 Negative metacognitive beliefs about cognitive harm due to drinking