Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias of included RCTs

From: Effectiveness of interventions to improve medication adherence in adults with depressive disorders: a meta-analysis

Cluster-RCTs

Study

Domains

Randomization process

Identification and recruitment of participants

Effect of assignment to intervention

Missing outcome data

Measurement of the outcome

Selection of the reported result

Akerblad 2003 [26]

High

Low

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Chang 2014 [72]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Keeley 2014 [38]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Some concerns

Some concerns

LeBlanc 2015 [41]

Unclear

Low

Some concerns

Low

Some concerns

Low

Pradeep 2014 [52]

Some concerns

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Low

Richards 2016 [53]

Low

Low

Low

Low

High

Low

Vergouwen 2009, 2005 [62, 63]

Low

Low

Low

Some concerns

Some concerns

Low

Individually RCTs

Study

Domains

Randomization process

 

Effect of assignment to intervention

Missing outcome data

Measurement of the outcome

Selection of the reported result

Adler 2004 [25]

Low

 

Low

Low

High

Low

Aljumah & Hassali, 2015 [59]

Low

 

Some concerns

High

Low

Low

Al-Saffar 2008, 2005 [37, 48]

Low

 

Low

Some concerns

Some concerns

Low

Browne 2002 [70]

Low

 

Low

Low

Low

Low

Capoccia 2004 [71]

Some concerns

 

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

De Jonghe 2001 [74]

Low

 

Some concerns

Low

Some concerns

Some concerns

Guo 2015 [67]

Some concerns

 

Low

Low

Some concerns

Some concerns

Hammonds 2015 [29]

Some concerns

 

Some concerns

Some concerns

Low

High

Interian 2013 [30]

Some concerns

 

Low

Low

Low

Low

John 2016 [31]

Low

 

Low

Some concerns

High

Some concerns

Katon 2002 [32]

Some concerns

 

Low

Some concerns

Some concerns

Some concerns

Katon 2001 [33]

Some concerns

 

Some concerns

Low

Some concerns

Low

Katon 1999 [34]

Low

 

Low

Low

Low

Low

Katon 1996 [35]

Some concerns

 

Some concerns

Low

Some concerns

Low

Katon 1995 [36]

Low

 

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Kutcher 2002 [40]

Low

 

Some concerns

High

Some concerns

Low

Perlis 2002 [75]

Some concerns

 

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Lin 2003 [42]

Some concerns

 

Low

Low

Low

Low

Lin 1999 [43]

Some concerns

 

Low

Some concerns

High

Low

Mantani 2017 [44]

Low

 

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Mundt 2001 [46]

Some concerns

 

Some concerns

Low

Some concerns

Low

Myers & Calvert, 1984 [49]

Some concerns

 

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Nwokeji 2012 [50]

High

 

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Perahia 2008 [51]

Some concerns

 

Low

Low

High

Low

Salkovskis 2006 [56]

Some concerns

 

Low

Some concerns

High

Some concerns

Rickles 2006, 2005 [54, 55]

Low

 

Low

High

Low

Low

Simon 2006 [57]

Low

 

Low

Low

Low

Low

Simon 2011 [58]

Low

 

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Smit 2005 [60]

High

 

Some concerns

Low

Low

Low

Vannachavee 2016 [61]

Some concerns

 

Low

Some concerns

Low

Low

Wiles 2014, 2013 [65, 66]

Low

 

Low

Some concerns

Some concerns

Low

Wiles 2008 [64]

Low

 

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Marasine, 2020 [69]

Low

 

Some concerns

Some concerns

Low

Low

Yusuf, 2021 [68]

Low

 

Some concerns

Some concerns

Low

Low

  1. High, High risk of bias, Low Low risk of bias, Unclear Unclear risk of bias
  2. RCTs Randomized controlled trials