Skip to main content

Table 1 Effect Sizes for RCTs of CET and SST in Schizophrenia

From: Cognitive Enhancement Therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluation

Study

Design

Interventions

Effect sizes

Eack et al. 2009 [39]

RCT

CET vs enriched supportive therapy

.82a, 1.53b social adjustment (SAS-II);

1.08a, 1.55b social cognition

Wojtalik et al. 2021 [40]

RCT

CET vs enriched supportive therapy

.74a role functioning

Bartels et al. 2014 [41]; Mueser et al. 2010 [42]

RCT

HOPES (SST) vs TAU

.20a, .29b,.08c social functioning (SBS)

.25a, .32b, .25c independent living (ILSS)

.44a, .37b, .26c community functioning (Multnomah CAS)

.54 a, .53b, .27c negative symptoms (SANS)

.51 a, .45b, .27c social competence (UPSA)

Kurtz et al. 2008 [23]

Meta-analysis of RCTs

SST vs TAU

.47 negative symptoms

.41 psychosocial functioning

Turner et al. 2018 [24]

Meta-analysis of RCTs

SST vs TAU

.32 (PANSS)

.19 (negative symptoms)

.41 (social competence)

  1. a12-month effect sizes, b24-month effect sizes; c36-month effect sizes