Study | Design | Interventions | Effect sizes |
---|---|---|---|
Eack et al. 2009 [39] | RCT | CET vs enriched supportive therapy | .82a, 1.53b social adjustment (SAS-II); 1.08a, 1.55b social cognition |
Wojtalik et al. 2021 [40] | RCT | CET vs enriched supportive therapy | .74a role functioning |
RCT | HOPES (SST) vs TAU | .20a, .29b,.08c social functioning (SBS) .25a, .32b, .25c independent living (ILSS) .44a, .37b, .26c community functioning (Multnomah CAS) .54 a, .53b, .27c negative symptoms (SANS) .51 a, .45b, .27c social competence (UPSA) | |
Kurtz et al. 2008 [23] | Meta-analysis of RCTs | SST vs TAU | .47 negative symptoms .41 psychosocial functioning |
Turner et al. 2018 [24] | Meta-analysis of RCTs | SST vs TAU | .32 (PANSS) .19 (negative symptoms) .41 (social competence) |