Skip to main content

Table 7 Linear mixed model analysis (ITT N = 81): objective executive functioning

From: A randomized controlled trial of Goal Management Training for executive functioning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders or psychosis risk syndromes

 

GMT Mean scores

WLC Mean Scores

Group x Time interaction

  

T1a

T2

T3

T1

T2

T3

df

b (GMT)

b SE

95% CI

P

r

Objective EF mean

−0.02c

0.18

0.22

0.02

0.21

0.38

70.43

− 0.05

0.05

− 0.15, 0.05

.331

.12

CPT3 d’

−2.79

−2.81

− 2.78

− 2.55

− 2.79

− 2.82

70.45

− 0.07

0.10

−0.27, 0.12

.463

.09

Digit Span

26.00

27.58

25.97

25.18

25.59

26.20

65.47

−0.54

0.49

−1.52, 0.44

.278

.13

CWIT Inhibition

29.36

30.81

29.15

26.49

27.07

25.53

48.53

0.03

0.05

−0.08, 0.13

.623

.07

CWIT Switching

6.68

5.68

6.48

6.95

7.89

6.14

58.65

0.03d

0.04

−0.04, 0.11

.391

.11

Tower

17.72c

18.21

19.58

18.21

20.10

20.68

84.07

−0.30

0.51

−1.33, 0.72

.558

.06

UPSA

78.03c

80.47

82.13

74.69

79.16

82.31

74.71

−1.66

1.16

−3.97, 0.65

.157

.16

Hotel Task

287.60c

321.79

263.48

389.32b

314.87

289.79

65.71

28.50

20.75

−12.93, 69.93

.174

.17

  1. aThe time variable was coded 0 for baseline, 1 for post-intervention testing and 2 for follow-up
  2. bThe GMT-group performed the Hotel Task significantly better than the WLC-group at baseline
  3. cSignificant main effect of time
  4. dVariable was log transformed to correct skewed distribution of scores
Back to article page

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us