Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance of IGT across all groups

From: Can cognition help predict suicide risk in patients with major depressive disorder? A machine learning study

 

Group

Group comparisons

 

HC* (N = 98)

DNS* (N = 61)

DSA* (N = 52)

HC* vs DNS* vs DSA*

DNS* + DSA* vs HC*

Mean(SD)

Mean(SD)

Mean(SD)

F

d.f

p-value

HC* vs DNS*

HC* vs DSA*

DNS* vs DSA*

t

p-value

p-value

p-value

p-value

IGT* performance

 Block1(Trials 1–20)

-5.27 (6.725)

-3.8 (7.269)

-3 (6.669)

2.056

2

0.131

0.195

0.056

0.54

1.935

0.054

 Block2(Trials 21–40)

-4.08 (7.896)

-2.47 (8.848)

-1.54 (7.868)

1.818

2

0.165

0.229

0.071

0.549

1.813

0.071

 Block3(Trials 41–60)

-1.55 (9.079)

-4.07 (9.072)

-2.38 (7.118)

1.583

2

0.208

0.077

0.574

0.305

-1.452

0.148

 Block4(Trials 61–80)

-0.51 (9.465)

-3.67 (8.471)

-3.94 (7.092)

3.782

2

0.024

0.027

0.022

0.867

-2.751

0.006

 Block5(Trials 81–100)

1.33 (9.877)

-2.34 (9.345)

-2.85 (9.712)

4.261

2

0.015

0.023

0.013

0.783

-2.913

0.004

 Net total score

-10.06 (34.148)

-16.53 (33.422)

-13.73 (28.883)

0.755

2

0.471

0.229

0.514

0.652

-1.145

0.254

 PartA(Trails 1–40)

-9.35 (12.315)

-6.27 (13.956)

-4.54 (12.221)

2.666

2

0.072

0.143

0.029

0.476

2.199

0.029

 PartB(Trails 41–100)

-0.735 (25.015)

-10.03 (20.881)

-9.17 (19.571)

3.838

2

0.023

0.018

0.031

0.916

-2.775

0.006

  1. *DSA Depressed suicide attempter, DNS Depressed non-suicide attempter, HC Healthy control, IGT Iowa Gambling Task