From: Parity of esteem and systems thinking: a theory informed qualitative inductive thematic analysis
Stages of Thematic Analysis | Establishing Trustworthiness |
---|---|
Stage 1: Data Familiarisation | JO immerses in data and researcher field notes, documents reflections, initial thoughts about codes and themes |
Stage 2: Initial generation of codes | JO feeds back initial thoughts to AB, PB, KL for comments, defines coding framework, documents team meetings and decisions |
Stage 3: Initial Theme identification | JO triangulates data from theoretical sample, carries out researcher triangulation with AB, makes a diagrammatic map of theme connections and notes about how decisions were made |
Stage 4: Reviewing themes | Themes and subthemes reviewed by AB, KL & PB. JO returns to raw data to review and consider whether anything has been omitted and if interpretation ‘fits’ |
Stage 5: Defining and naming themes | JO returns to field interviewer AB to triangulate data and considers theoretical triangulation with existing published evidence for confirmability. JO, AB, KL& PB discuss themes and reach consensus. |
Stage 6: Producing the paper | JO feeds back findings informally to participants wishing to remain involved (carries out member checking), explains reasoning for choices and the processes incurred. JO drafts the paper and this is then fed back on by KL, AB & PB. |