Table 2 Quality of the performance of RFs in each QuIRC-SA domain by RF type
QuIRC-SA domain (range 0 - 100%) Higher scores denote better quality | SRP1 N = 17 (35.4%) RFs | SRP2 N = 15 (31.3%) RFs | SRP3 N = 16 (33.3%) RFs | Total RFs N = 48 (100%) | p ANOVA* | Bonferroni post-hoc correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Living environment, Mean (SD) | 58.3 (9.3) | 58.4 (11.2) (14 RFs) | – | 58.3 (10.0) | 0.979 | – |
Therapeutic environment, Mean (SD) | 52.9 (8.9) | 49.8 (6.0) | 50.7 (5.8) | 51.2 (7.1) | 0.447 | – |
Self-management and autonomy, Mean (SD) | 49.5 (6.2) | 45.4 (6.9) | 58.1 (9.3) | 51.1 (9.1) | < 0.001 | SRP1/SRP2 vs SRP3 |
Social interface, Mean (SD) | 50.9 (9.1) | 41.4 (11.1) | 52.9 (11.2) | 48.6 (11.4) | 0.008 | SRP2 vs SRP1/SRP3 |
Human rights, Mean (SD) | 53.2 (8.5) | 56.9 (13.2) | 65.2 (10.1) | 58.4 (11.6) | 0.008 | SRP1 vs SRP3 |
Treatments and interventions, Mean (SD) | 57.7 (6.0) | 53.8 (5.1) | 56.8 (5.5) | 56.2 (5.7) | 0.143 | – |
Recovery based practice, Mean (SD) | 46.2 (10.1) | 42.1 (7.6) | 48.8 (8.6) | 45.8 (9.1) | 0.115 | – |
Total mean (SD) score | 52.7 (10.9) | 47.9 (5.4) | 57.3 (7.0) | 52.3 (9.3) | < 0.001 | SRP2 vs SRP1 vs SRP3 |