Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk of Bias for included studies

From: Comprehensive ABA-based interventions in the treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder – a meta-analysis

Author(s) (Year)

Sequence generation

Allocation sequence concealment

Masking of participants and personnela

Masking of outcome assessmenta

Incomplete data

Selective reporting

Other risks of bias

Eikeseth et al. (2002) [49]

High risk (availability of personnel)

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

High risk (contamination, baseline imbalance)

Eikeseth et al. (2012) [50]

High risk (type of hospital/center)

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk (contamination)

Eldevik et al. (2012) [51]

High risk (type of hospital/center)

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

High risk (contamination)

Fava et al. (2011) [52]

High risk (parental preference)

High risk

High risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

High risk (contamination)

Fernell et al. (2011) [53]

High risk (post-hoc assignment)

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

Low risk

High risk (contamination, baseline imbalance)

Howard et al. (2005) [24]

High risk (Placement by educational team/ parents)

High risk

High risk

Unclear risk

High risk

Low risk

High risk (contamination, baseline imbalance)

Magiati et al. (2007) [54]

High risk (decision was made before study assignment)

High risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

High risk (baseline imbalance)

Molnár et al. (2017) [55]

High risk (date of assignment)

High risk

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear risk (baseline imbalance)

Remington et al. (2007) [56]

High risk (parental preference)

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

High risk (baseline imbalance)

Shawler (2016) [48]

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Zachor & Ben-Itzchak (2010) [57]

High risk (place of residence)

High risk

High risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

  1. Note. aassessed for all outcomes combined, because they would all be affected by performance or detection bias in the same way