From: Mental health outcome measures in the Australian context: what is the problem represented to be?
1. What is the problem [of mental health outcome measurement] represented to be? | |
2. What presuppositions or assumptions underpin this representation of the ‘problem’? | |
3. How has this representation of the ‘problem’ come about? | |
4. What is left unproblematic in this problem representation? Where are the silences? Can the ‘problem’ be thought about differently? | |
5. What effects are produced by this representation of the ‘problem’? | |
6. How/where has this representation of the ‘problem’ been produced, disseminated, and defended? How has it been (or could it be) questioned, disrupted, and replaced? |