Skip to main content

Table 3 Means and effect sizes for child outcomes

From: Feasibility randomised controlled trial of the Early Adolescent Skills for Emotions psychological intervention with young adolescents in Lebanon

Outcome (alpha)

 

Mean (95% CI)

Baseline

 

Endline

3-month follow-up

EASE (N = 35)

ETAU (N = 32)

EASE (N = 35)

ETAU (N = 32)

d

EASE (N = 35)

ETAU (N = 32)

d

PSC

(α = 0.78)

20.4

(17.2, 23.5)

21.0

(17.0, 25.0)

21.0

(17.8, 24.2)

20.7

(16.7, 24.6)

0.12

21.3

(18.2, 24.5)

20.3

(16.3, 24.2)

0.21

PHQ

(α = 0.77)

5.2

(3.4, 7.0)

5.4

(3.1, 7.7)

5.3

(3.5, 7.1)

5.1

(2.8, 7.4)

0.10

5.0

(3.2, 6.8)

5.6

(3.3, 7.9)

-0.08

CRIES

(α = 0.78)

21.9

(17.0, 26.7)

20.9

(15.0, 26.8)

22.7

(17.8, 27.5)

20.8

(15.0, 26.7)

0.07

19.2

(14.3, 24.0)

23.9

(18.0, 29.8)

-0.44

Functioning

(α = 0.79)

6.4

(4.0, 8.8)

6.9

(3.8, 10.0)

5.8

(3.4 8.2)

7.4

(4.3, 10.5)

-0.18

6.7

(4.3, 9.1)

6.1

(2.9, 9.2)

0.18

Wellbeing^

(α = 0.83)

46.3

(43.0, 49.6)

46.4

(43.0, 49.8)

48.8

(45.6, 52.1)

49.9

(46.5, 53.3)

-0.10

43.6

(40.3, 46.9)

44.1

(40.7, 47.6)

-0.05

  1. Means, SDs are based on coefficients and combination of coefficients from mixed effects model
  2. Cohen’s d effect size was calculated by dividing the predicted difference in mean change from the mixed effects model by the pooled, imputed baseline SD. Negative effect size indicates a larger change in EASE compared to ETAU
  3. Model included fixed effects of arm, time and arm X time interaction, and random effects of pt_code, siblingid, and Ease group
  4. All participants were included in the model at all timepoints following mean imputation
  5. ^ For this measure, an increased score indicates an improvement. For other measures, decreased scores indicate reduction in symptoms/impairment