Article | Country | N; gender | Mean Age (SD), years | Sample | Intervention/s Detail | Control | Peer-Worker | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements | Training | |||||||
Depression & Anxiety | ||||||||
Ellis et al. (2011) | Australia | 39; 77% female, 23% male | 19.67 (1.66); range 18–25 | University Students experiencing low-to-moderate depression & anxiety | 3 × 1-h sessions over 3 weeks working through the content of the MoodGarden website: a. Tools for self-management b. Bulletins on lifestyle management c. Discussions on effective treatments d. Messageboard for peer-based support e. Blogs and Charts | 1. MoodGym Five modules of online CBT: a. Introduction to CBT b. Reducing dysfunctional thinking c. Overcoming negative feelings d. Identifying stress and relaxation e. Problem-solving strategies and enhancing relationships Control: No intervention | Lived experience with a mood disorder | Not reported |
Conley et al. (2020) | USA | 118; 82.2% female, 17.8% male | 20.8 (4.99); range 18 or older | University Students who identify experiencing a mental health illness/ challenge | 4 × 2–3-h sessions a. Consider the pros and cons of disclosing b. There are different ways to disclose c. Telling your story d. Booster Session: Check-in about whether participants have chosen to disclose | Control: Waitlist control | University Student with lived experience of a mental health illness or challenge | Peer facilitators completed two days of training in the HOP-C manual |
Mulfinger et al. (2018) | Germany | 98; 69% female, non-binary not reported | 15.75 (1.15); range 13–18 | Inpatients and outpatients with Anxiety and/or Depression | 3 × 2-h weekly sessions over 3 weeks of Honest, Open, Proud (HOP): Themes: a. Challenging beliefs or self-stigma b. Pros & cons of disclosure c. The right person d. Telling one’s story e. Role of solidarity and peer support Workbooks contained vignettes, first-person accounts, worksheets, tables and role-plays 1 young expert and 1 young peer worker | Control: TAU | Young adult peer with lived experience of mental illness | Peer facilitators were trained by researchers and conducted a practice session |
First Episode Psychosis | ||||||||
Alvarez-Jimenez et al. (2021) | Australia | 170; 47.1% female, 52.9% male | 20.91 (2.88); range 16–27 | Young people in recovery of First Episode Psychosis, exiting early intervention service | Mean number of individual posts and/or comments = 21.49 (SD = 41.71) over 18 months (Mean = 8.15 (SD = 5.65)) of Online Social Network: a. Icebreakers b. user-generated threads c. content related to mental health d. content of general interest Vocational training: a. Ask the expert b. individualized online vocational support Online Therapy w/ health professional: a. Online pathways – distinct themes on recovery b. Online Steps—interactive therapy modules | Control: TAU | Peer workers had lived experience of mental illness | Not reported |
Prevention of Eating Disorders | ||||||||
Becker et al. (2010) | USA | 102; 100% female | 18.73 (0.72); range 18–21 | University students (Freshman or Sophomore) | 2 × 2-h sessions over 2 weeks of Cognitive Dissonance: a. Group discussions on the thin ideal b. Group brainstorming on cost of the thin ideal c. Homework body appreciation d. Role-plays on resisting the thin ideal e. Shared lived experiences from peer-leaders and peers in the sessions | 1.Media Advocacy: a. Watch videos b. Group discussions of the thin ideal c. Group brainstorming on cost of the thin ideal d. Food and exercise diaries | Peer-leaders with past participation in the program and a member or the sorority | 4.5 h experiential training sessions. Peer-leaders trained in teams (3 – 4 peer-leaders at a time) |
Ciao et al. (2021) | USA | Trial 1 N = 98; female 80% male 14% non-binary 6% Trial 2 N = 141; 80% female 15% male 5% non-binary | Trial 1 20.39 (4.12); range 18–50 Trial 2 19.66 (2.53); Range 18–36 | University students interested in a body acceptance program | 2 × 2-h group sessions over 2 weeks of the ‘EVERYbody Project’ involving 4–9 participants a. Group discussions b. Role-play c. Group activities Trial 1: 1 × Expert-leader & 2 x peer-leaders Trial 2: 3–4 × peer-leaders | Trial 1: Control: No intervention Trial 2: Video intervention a. Watch videos b. Reflective writing | Peer-leaders with past participation in the female program | Training followed protocol used in the peer-led ‘Body Project’ Trial 1 2 days of training (16 h) Trial 2 2 days of training (16 h) with discussion on group facilitation skills and role plays on difficult diverse situations |
Kilpela et al. (2016) | USA | 180; 62% female, 38% male | 19.9 (1.2); range 18–23 | University students | 2 × 2-h sessions over 2 weeks of ‘Body Project’ a. Group discussions on the thin ideal contrasting healthy ideals, the origin of the thin ideal, past pressures b. Group brainstorming on cost of the thin ideal and combating the thin ideal c. Homework: body appreciation, writing to a young person, challenging own behaviour d. Role-plays on resisting the thin ideal e. Shared lived experiences from peer leaders and peers in the sessions | Control: Waitlist | Peer-leaders with past participation in the program | Trainer to Trainer method: Experienced peer leaders in the program trained new peer leaders over two days |
Resendel et al. (2021) | Brazil | 74; 100% female | 20.5 (2.02); range 18–30 | University students | 4 × 60-min sessions over 4 weeks of ‘Body Project’ led by two peer leaders a. Group discussions on the thin ideal, body appreciation/concerns b. Group brainstorming on the cost of the thin ideal c. Homework sessions on body appreciation d. Role-plays on resisting the thin ideal e. Engaged in further body activism | Control: No intervention | Have experience in Intuitive Eating and past body image concerns and currently a university student | References the Body Project website: Therefore, training on the concept and rationale of the body project, in group discussions and role plays, using the manual for guidance. Possibly some practice runs with feedback from supervisors, but unclear from publication |
Prevention in Substance Use | ||||||||
German et al. (2012) | Thailand | 983; 27.3% female 72.7% male | Median 19 (IQR = 18–20); range 18–25 | Used meth-amphetamine & engaged in sex at least 3 times in the last 3 months | 7 × 1.5–2.5 h group session twice weekly over 1 month of ‘Peer Education’, in groups of 8–12 participants: a. Drug use on individuals b. Drug use and social influences c. Drug use and sex d. Drug use and risk behaviours e. Family and community f. Community project g. Review and graduation 2 boosters (3 & 6-month mark) | 7 × 1.5–2.5 h group session twice weekly over 1 month of ‘Life Skills’, in groups of 8–12 participants: a. Understanding life b. Decision making skills and old friends/new friends c. Danger of drug use d. Sexually infectious diseases e. How important is stress? f. Emotion management and life goals g. Envelope of goodness and graduation Network groups for participants in both Peer Education and Life Skills received no intervention | Early 20 s, participated in an earlier study as part of the ethnography team | Researchers trained peer facilitators in a 1 week long intensive training session on building a prosocial role and to increase positive communication and interactions with peers |