Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression analysis for the relationship between dietary patterns and odds of anxiety

From: The association between a priori dietary patterns and psychological disorders in military personnel

 

Odds of anxiety

Model 1#

Model 2*

Model 3&

p

Odds ratio (95% CI)

p

Odds ratio (95% CI)

p

Odds ratio (95% CI)

HEI-2015

Q1

 

1

 

1

 

1

Q2

0.22

0.69 (0.38–1.25)

0.16

0.65 (0.35–1.19)

0.16

0.64 (0.35–1.18)

Q3

0.04

0.54 (0.29–0.98)

0.02

0.50 (0.27–0.92)

0.03

0.51 (0.27–0.94)

Q4

0.07

0.57 (0.31–1.05)

0.03

0.51 (0.27–0.95)

0.03

0.51 (0.27–0.96)

P trend

 

0.05

 

0.02

 

0.02

DII

Q1

 

1

 

1

 

1

Q2

0.88

0.95 (0.51–1.77)

0.94

0.97 (0.52–1.82)

0.92

0.96 (0.51–1.18)

Q3

0.37

1.41 (0.65–3.06)

0.32

1.46 (0.67–3.17)

0.36

1.43 (0.65–3.13)

Q4

0.03

2.75 (1.08–6.99)

0.03

2.80 (1.09–7.15)

0.03

2.74 (1.06–7.04)

P trend

 

0.02

 

0.02

 

0.02

DASH

Q1

 

1

 

1

 

1

Q2

0.21

0.68 (0.38–1.23)

0.22

0.69 (0.38–1.25)

0.22

0.69 (0.38–1.25)

Q3

0.12

0.60 (0.31–1.15)

0.09

0.56 (0.29–1.09)

0.09

0.56 (0.29–1.10)

Q4

0.20

0.67 (0.37–1.23)

0.15

0.64 (0.35–1.17)

0.15

0.64 (0.35–1.18)

P trend

 

0.23

 

0.16

 

0.16

MD

Q1

 

1

 

1

 

1

Q2

0.72

1.10 (0.63–1.92)

0.54

1.18 (0.67–2.09)

0.55

1.18 (0.67–2.09)

Q3

0.80

1.07 (0.59–1.95)

0.92

1.02 (0.56–1.87)

0.95

1.01 (0.55–1.86)

Q4

0.14

0.64 (0.35–1.16)

0.11

0.60 (0.32–1.12)

0.11

0.60 (0.33–1.12)

P trend

 

0.17

 

0.11

 

0.11

  1. # Model 1: adjusted for daily energy intake
  2. * Model 2: adjusted for variables in Model 1 plus physical activity, body mass index, age and smoking
  3. & Model 3: adjusted for variables in Model 2 plus marital status and level of education
Back to article page

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us