Skip to main content

Table 2 Measurement Invariance across Gender in the total sample

From: Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the meaning in life scale in a sample of young adults

Model

χ²

df

CFI

RMSEA

SRMR

Model Comparison

Δχ²

ΔCFI

ΔRMSEA

ΔSRMR

Δdf

p

Model 1: 10-item MLQ

Configural

405.12

90

0.744

0.125

0.102

       

Metric

395.12

76

0.751

0.130

0.101

Configural vs. metric

17.169

0.007

0.005

0.001

8

0.028

Scalar

405.12

84

0.744

0.125

0.102

Metric vs. scalar

17.169

0.007

0.005

0.001

8

0.028

Model 2: 8-item MLQ

Configural

91.321

50

0.971

0.049

0.040

       

Metric

82.135

44

0.973

0.050

0.039

Configural vs. metric

9.186

0.002

0.001

0.001

6

0.163

Scalar

91.321

50

0.971

0.049

0.040

Metric vs. scalar

9.186

0.002

0.001

0.001

6

0.163

  1. Note. CFI = Comparative fit index; RMSEA = Steiger-Lind root mean square error of approximation; SRMR = Standardised root mean square residual