Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Yves Chaput |
| 18 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - elisabeth eurelings |
| 11 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ingrid Sochting |
| 3 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Miki Matsunaga |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 3 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 17 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - elisabeth eurelings |
| 18 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Yves Chaput |
| 21 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ingrid Sochting |
| 15 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Miki Matsunaga |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 15 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 15 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Miki Matsunaga |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 15 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 11 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Miki Matsunaga |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 11 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 16 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-10-22 |
You can find further information about peer review here.