Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anne Mijch |
6 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Tate |
22 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vincent Le Moing |
14 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Noeline Nakasujja |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Noeline Nakasujja |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
2 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vincent Le Moing |
19 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Tate |
16 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Noeline Nakasujja |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
16 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
24 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Noeline Nakasujja |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
31 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Noeline Nakasujja |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
31 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
7 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Noeline Nakasujja |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
7 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
10 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-10-44 |
You can find further information about peer review here.