Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 12 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Schlaepfer |
| 6 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Walters |
| 10 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 17 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Schlaepfer |
| 17 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Walters |
| 21 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 21 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 1 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 1 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 4 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 4 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 9 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 9 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 16 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-11-42 |
You can find further information about peer review here.