Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 16 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Brådvik |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 16 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 4 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Yvonne Bergmans |
| 10 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sudhir Kumar C Thevan |
| 10 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dana Lizardi |
| 5 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Brådvik |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 5 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 20 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Yvonne Bergmans |
| 4 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Brådvik |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 4 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 5 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Brådvik |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 5 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Jan 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Jan 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-11-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.