Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 24 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anthony Jorm |
| 26 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Corey Mackenzie |
| 16 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Esa Aromaa |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 1 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anthony Jorm |
| 3 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Corey Mackenzie |
| 2 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Esa Aromaa |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 2 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 22 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Corey Mackenzie |
| 9 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Esa Aromaa |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 24 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Esa Aromaa |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 24 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 31 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 31 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-11-52 |
You can find further information about peer review here.