Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anthony Jorm |
26 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Corey Mackenzie |
16 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Esa Aromaa |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
1 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anthony Jorm |
3 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Corey Mackenzie |
2 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Esa Aromaa |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
22 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Corey Mackenzie |
9 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Esa Aromaa |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
24 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Esa Aromaa |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
31 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
31 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-11-52 |
You can find further information about peer review here.