Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 May 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rosemary Tannock |
8 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - conor dolan |
20 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ridha Joober |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
1 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ueli C. Müller |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
1 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
16 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ueli C. Müller |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
16 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rosemary Tannock |
12 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - conor dolan |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
12 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ueli C. Müller |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
26 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ueli C. Müller |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
26 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
7 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-11-54 |
You can find further information about peer review here.