Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: A comparative study on long-term evoked auditory and visual potential responses between Schizophrenic patients and normal subjects

Original Submission
10 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Min-Wei Huang
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Min-Wei Huang
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
1 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Min-Wei Huang
1 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hsien-Yuan Lane
9 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guochuan Tsai
14 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chein-I Chang
Resubmission - Version 7
1 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
3 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Min-Wei Huang
Resubmission - Version 8
3 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
4 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Min-Wei Huang
Resubmission - Version 9
4 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 9
6 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hsien-Yuan Lane
19 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chein-I Chang
1 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guochuan Tsai
10 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Min-Wei Huang
Resubmission - Version 10
10 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 10
10 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Min-Wei Huang
Resubmission - Version 11
10 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 11
5 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guochuan Tsai
18 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Min-Wei Huang
Resubmission - Version 12
18 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 12
21 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Min-Wei Huang
Resubmission - Version 13
21 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 13
Publishing
4 May 2011 Editorially accepted
4 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-11-74

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page