Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
24 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Büchi |
31 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Elbert |
24 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Juanita Haagsma |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
24 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
30 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Büchi |
20 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Juanita Haagsma |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
27 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Juanita Haagsma |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
27 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
4 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Juanita Haagsma |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
4 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
9 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-12-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.