Skip to main content

Table 1 Distribution and descriptive characteristics of diagnostic groups at admission

From: The impact of ADHD symptoms and global impairment in childhood on working disability in mid-adulthood: a 28-year follow-up study using official disability pension records in a high-risk in-patient population

Diagnostic groups

CD

ADHD

ED

MCE

Total study population

ANOVA with post hoc*

N

39

53

98

67

257

 

CGAS

44.0(6.5)

41.9(5.5)

48.9(9.6)

43.4(6.5)

45.3(8.1)

CD=bADHD=MCE<ED, p<0.05

Age at admission

8.9(1.7)

8.0(2.3)

8.9(2.7)

8.8(1.9)

8.7(2.3)

P= 0.13

Male gendera

31(80)

44(83)

52(53)

48(72)

175(68)

ED< ADHD=CD=MCE, p<0.05

CFD

4.9(1.0)

4.0(1.4)

4.1(1.3)

4.7(1.1)

4.4(1.3)

ED=ADHD<CD=MCE, p<0.05

  1. ANOVA with post hoc analysis to provide differences between diagnostic groups.
  2. *ANOVA post hoc if p<0.05 in one-way Anova.
  3. a Pearson’s chi square/Fisher’s exact test.
  4. b non-significant differences.
  5. CD, Conduct disorder; ADHD, Hyperkinetic disorder; ED, Emotional Disorder; MCE, Mixed disorder of conduct and emotions; CGAS, Children’s Global Assessment Scale; CFD, Chronic family difficulties scale.