Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 24 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Chan |
| 17 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Fisher |
| 7 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Janet Nakigudde |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 26 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Chan |
| 15 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Fisher |
| 8 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Janet Nakigudde |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 12 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Fisher |
| 13 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Chan |
| 3 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Janet Nakigudde |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 28 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Janet Nakigudde |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 28 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 20 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Chan |
| 27 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Janet Nakigudde |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 27 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 Apr 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 May 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-13-131 |
You can find further information about peer review here.