Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Anke Bramesfeld |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Anke Bramesfeld |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
13 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jocelyn Catty |
15 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marjan Drukker |
21 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bernd Puschner |
21 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hans Kroon |
22 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Anke Bramesfeld |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
22 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
31 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marjan Drukker |
6 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bernd Puschner |
11 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jocelyn Catty |
13 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hans Kroon |
27 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Anke Bramesfeld |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
27 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
6 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-13-56 |
You can find further information about peer review here.