Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis results for the association between parent-adolescent interaction and AIA development a,b

From: Parent-adolescent interaction and risk of adolescent internet addiction: a population-based study in Shanghai

Potential risk factors

N

Odds ratio (95% CI)

  

Base Model 1 c (Un-adjusted)

Model 2 d (Adjusted)

Parental attitude toward adolescent internet use

5104

  

Agree

441

1.0 (Reference)

1.0 (Reference)

Relatively agree

1688

0.90(0.59-1.36)

1.05(0.67-1.64)

General

1437

1.25(0.83-1.88)

1.08(0.69-1.69)

Relatively disagree

1312

1.72(1.15-2.57)** e

1.54(0.98-2.40)

Strongly disagree

226

2.42(1.45-4.05)** e

2.20(1.24-3.91)** e

Mother-adolescent relationship

5105

  

Very good

3137

1.0 (Reference)

1.0 (Reference)

Relatively good

1353

1.93(1.55-2.41)***

1.25 (0.95-1.66)

General

522

2.16(1.61-2.90)***

1.20 (0.83-1.73)

Very & relatively bad

93

6.76(4.26-10.73)***

3.79 (2.22-6.48)***

Father-adolescent relationship

5103

  

Very good

2691

1.0 (Reference)

1.0 (Reference)

Relatively good

1332

1.76(1.39-2.24)***

1.32(0.98-1.76)

General

888

2.24(1.74-2.89)***

1.39(0.99-1.93)

Very & relatively bad

192

3.46(2.32-5.15)***

1.76(1.10-2.80)*

Parental marriage

5118

  

Married-and-together

4477

1.0 (Reference)

1.0 (Reference)

Married-but-separated

81

2.32(1.29-4.17)**

2.06(1.05-4.06)*

Divorced

360

1.55(1.11-2.16)*

1.14 (0.74-1.75)

Widowed

86

1.30(0.65-2.61)

1.52 (0.66-3.47)

Remarried

114

1.43(0.79-2.57)

1.13 (0.61-2.10)

Family structure

5122

  

Nuclear family

3380

1.0 (Reference)

1.0 (Reference)

Three-generation family

1069

0.87(0.67-1.12)

0.84(0.64-1.11)

Single-parent family

357

1.63(1.17-2.26)*

1.19(0.79-1.79)

Left-behind adolescents

181

1.49(0.94-2.37)

1.26(0.76-2.08)

Weekend parents

135

1.14(0.64-2.05)

0.94(0.50-1.76)

Monthly allowance levels

5108

  

Among resident students

451

  

<100 RMB/month

105

1.0 (Reference)

1.0 (Reference)

100 ~ 299 RMB/month

154

0.66(0.24-1.83)

0.59(0.20-1.76)

300 ~ 599 RMB/month

131

1.34(0.53-3.36)*

1.15(0.43-3.13)

>600 RMB/month

61

3.61(1.42-9.21)**

3.60(1.27-10.20)*

Among commuter students

4657

  

<100 RMB/month

2671

1.0 (Reference)

1.0 (Reference)

100 ~ 299 RMB/month

1418

1.85(1.47-2.32)***

1.64(1.28-2.11)***

300 ~ 599 RMB/month

410

2.36(1.72-3.25)***

1.75(1.22-2.50)**

>600 RMB/month

158

2.00(1.21-3.31)**

1.32(0.76-2.31)

  1. aAIA = adolescent internet addiction.
  2. bThe logistic regressions were fitted to model the possibility of adolescent having AIA. We set ‶0″ for adolescents with total scores of DRM 52 scale <163 and ‶1″ for adolescents with total scores ≥163.
  3. cIn Base Model 1, only family background variables were included.
  4. dIn model 2, family background variables (same variables in Base Model 1) and other related variables including grades, types of schools, monthly consumption expenditure levels, academic achievement levels and family social economic status were adjusted. Two variables including family structure and marital status were forced in this model.
  5. e***indicated p < 0.001, **indicated p < 0.01, *indicated p < 0.05.
Back to article page

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us