Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Apr 2002 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
9 May 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Berk |
28 May 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vance Berger |
17 Jun 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Clive E Adams |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
17 Jun 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Jun 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Berk |
3 Jul 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vance Berger |
23 Jul 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Clive E Adams |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Jul 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
22 Aug 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vance Berger |
10 Sep 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Clive E Adams |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Sep 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Oct 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vance Berger |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
16 Oct 2002 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Oct 2002 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-2-11 |
You can find further information about peer review here.