Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
12 Oct 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vijendra Singh |
24 Oct 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lonnie Zwaigenbaum |
19 Nov 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Bengt Sivberg |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
19 Nov 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
8 Dec 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vijendra Singh |
18 Dec 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lonnie Zwaigenbaum |
13 Jan 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Bengt Sivberg |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
13 Jan 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
24 Jan 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vijendra Singh |
4 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lonnie Zwaigenbaum |
27 Apr 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Bengt Sivberg |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
27 Apr 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
11 May 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Bengt Sivberg |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
11 May 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
2 Jun 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
2 Jun 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-5-27 |
You can find further information about peer review here.