Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 7 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - J. Daniel Ragland |
| 23 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Duschek |
| 3 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Njemanze |
| 6 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Schuepbach |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Duschek |
| 22 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - J. Daniel Ragland |
| 22 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Njemanze |
| 24 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicholas Horton |
| 7 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Schuepbach |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 14 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Schuepbach |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 1 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicholas Horton |
| 9 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Schuepbach |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 16 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Schuepbach |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 16 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 May 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 24 May 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-6-25 |
You can find further information about peer review here.