Skip to main content


  • Oral presentation
  • Open Access

Mandated community treatment: a promising concept for world psychiatry?

  • 1
BMC Psychiatry20077 (Suppl 1) :S7

  • Published:


  • Advance Directive
  • Psychiatric Treatment
  • Criminal Offense
  • International Debate
  • Money Manager

Much of the international debate on "outpatient commitment" or "community treatment orders" assumes that court-ordered treatment in the community is simply an extension of long-existing policies authorizing involuntary commitment as a hospital inpatient. In fact, however, outpatient commitment is only one of many forms of "leverage" being used to mandate adherence to psychiatric treatment in community settings. In the social welfare system, benefits disbursed by money managers and the provision of subsidized housing are both used to assure treatment adherence. Similarly, for people who commit a criminal offense, adherence to psychiatric treatment may be made a condition of probation. Favorable disposition of a case by a mental health court may also be tied to treatment participation. Psychiatric advance directives can be thought of as a form of "selfmandated" treatment. The MacArthur Foundation's Research Network on Mandated Community Treatment is engaged in a broad program of research on the uses of leverage to promote adherence to psychiatric services in the United States.

Authors’ Affiliations

University of Virginia School of Law, 580 Massie Road, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, USA


© Monahan; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.