Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of pre- post-intervention and 6-months follow-up measures and significant interactions on HLM analysis

From: Efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation on psychosocial functioning in Borderline Personality Disorder: a randomized controlled trial

 

CR

PE

  
 

Baseline (n = 36)

Post-treatment (n = 22)

Follow-up (n = 20)

Post-hoc tests

Baseline (n = 34)

Post-treatment (n = 24)

Follow-up (n = 22)

Post-hoc tests

HLM

        

Group

Time

Group x time

Psychosocial Functioning

FAST

37.86 (1.81)

36.86 (2.55)

29.55 (2.92)

p = .018

42.94 (1.89)

38.01 (2.51)

35.61 (3.03)

n.s.

n.s.

p = .004

n.s.

Clinical variables

          

BSL-23

42.32 (3.90)

42.56 (5.00)

34.91 (5.25)

n.s.

40.42 (4.14)

38.89 (4.86)

39.59 (5.53)

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

HARS

24.89 (1.94)

19.76 (2.62)

16.53 (2.61)

p = .023

21.60 (2.02)

18.61 (2.65)

11.52 (2.87)

p = .006

n.s.

p < .001

n.s.

MADRS

22.54 (1.60)

19.16 (1.83)

20.02 (1.98)

n.s.

18.67 (1.65)

16.58 (1.85)

9.91 (2.13)

p < .001

p = .009

p < .001

n.s.

BIS

64.53 (2.70)

65.93 (3.34)

57.14 (4.04)

n.s.

70.59 (2.84)

67.92 (3.33)

67.06 (4.35)

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

Neuropsychological variables

Memory Index

–.10 (.11)

–.13 (.09)

–.15 (.11)

n.s.

.20 (.11)

.01 (.09)

.11 (.11)

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

Attention Index

.01 (.13)

–.07 (.15)

–.18 (.15)

n.s.

.10 (.14)

.29 (.15)

.35 (.15)

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

p = .020

Executive Index

-.04 (.20)

.08 (.24)

–.08 (.24)

n.s.

-.02 (.21)

.38 (.23)

.13 (.25)

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

  1. t-test * < .05, ** < .01, *** < .001
  2. Note: HLM analyses correspond to pre-, post- and follow-up measures. Post-hoc were obtained by HLM per each group. FAST Functioning Assessment Scale Test, BSL-23 Borderline Symptom List – 23, HARS Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, MADRS Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, BIS Barrat Impulsivity Scale