Skip to main content

Table 3 Mediation effects of ToM and neurocognition in the mini Ultimatum Game

From: Theory of mind deficits partly mediate impaired social decision-making in schizophrenia

Dependent variables

a

b

c

c’

ab

SE

Effect Size

(ab/c)

95% C.I.

LL

UL

TMPST-Q

Hyper-unfair offer

(8 vs. 2 / 10 vs. 0)

2.693

0.034

0.231

0.140a

0.091

0.047

39%

0.026

0.211

Fair alternative

(8 vs. 2 / 5 vs. 5)

2.693

0.031

0.218

0.134a

0.083

0.049

38%

0.010

0.198

Hyper-fair alternative

(8 vs. 2 / 2 vs. 8)

2.693

0.034

0.211

0.119a

0.092

0.052

44%

0.013

0.211

Hyper-fair offer

(8 vs. 2 / 2 vs. 8)

2693

−0.026

−0.172

−0.103a

−0.070

0.042

41%

−0.179

-0.011

BACS-T

Hyper-unfair offer

(8 vs. 2 / 10 vs. 0)

1.214

0.057a

0.231

0.162a

0.069

0.056

-

−0.036

0.188

Hyper-fair offer

(8 vs. 2 / 2 vs. 8)

1.214

−0.047a

−0.172

−0.116a

−0.057

0.047

-

−0.187

0.014

TMPST-Q + BACS-T

Hyper-unfair offer

(8 vs. 2 / 10 vs. 0)

2.693

0.031

0.231

0.119a

0.112

0.055

48%

0.005

0.221

Hyper-fair offer

(8 vs. 2 / 2 vs. 8)

2.693

−0.023

−0.172

−0.084a

−0.089

0.054

52%

−0.214

−0.006

  1. a, effect of X on M; b, effect of M on Y; c, total effect of X on Y; c’, direct effect of X on Y; ab, mediation effect; SE, standard error of estimation of ab; C.I., confidence interval of ab; TMPST-Q, questionnaire scores from the Theory of Mind Picture Stories Task; BACS-T, composite scores from the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Scale.
  2. a P > 0.05