Skip to main content

Table 5 Mixed modeling analysis testing the effect of the CARe methodology on secondary outcomes

From: How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial

  Hope Empowerment Self-efficacy Unmet Needs
ICC teama .03 .00 .01 .03
ICC participants .59 .57 .67 .48
  Test P 95% CI Test P 95% CI Test P 95% CI Test P 95% CI
Time F = 1.80 .16   F = 1.51 .23   F = .32 .73   F = 10.07 .00  
T1 B = .00 .96 −.06–.06   .14 −.12–.02   .45 −.07–.15   .24 −.82–.21
T2 B = −08 07 .00–.16 B = −.05 .70 −.08–.11 B = .04 .99 −.16–.16 B = −.31 .00 −2.34- -.91
Intervention B = .03 .49 −.07–.13 B = .02 .96 −.09–.09 B = .00 .98 −.17–.18 B = −1.63 .65 −.69–.43
Intervention x timeb Χ2 = .22 .90   Χ2 = 1.99 .37   Χ2 = 3.63 .16   Χ2 = .73 .70  
Covariatesc
Age B = −.00 .80 .00–.00 B = .00 .07 −.00–.01 B = .00 .85 −.01–.01 B = −.01 .19 −.03–.01
Gender B = −.13 .00 −.22--.04 B = −.13 .01 −.23--.03 B = −.30 .00 −.48--.11 B = −.48 .11 −1.08–.12
Partner B = .09 .05 .001–.18 B = .02 .72 −.08–.12 B = .16 .09 −.03–.34 B = −.12 .74 −.83–.59
Symptoms B = −.23 .00 −.29--.17 B = −.31 .00 −.38---.24 B = −.70 .00 −.82--.58 B = 2.48 .00 2.04–2.90
Amount of support B = −.03 .21 −.07–.02 B = −.01 .65 −.06–.04 B = .00 .93 −.08–.09 B = −.09 .56 −.41–.23
Recovery knowledge team B = −.02 .84 −.22–.18 B = .01 .95 −.22–.23 B = −.29 .14 −.68–.09 B = −1.09 .18 −2.66-.49
Recovery promoting relationship B = .15 .00 .09–.21 B = .38 .00 .32–.45 B = .29 .00 .16–.42 B = −.49 .03 −.94--.04
  1. aIntra-Class Correlation for team and participants
  2. bEffect of the intervention. The chi-square values are values of the deviance or likelihood ratio test
  3. cThe effects of the included covariates