Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | BMC Psychiatry

Fig. 2

From: Economic evaluation of an experience sampling method intervention in depression compared with treatment as usual using data from a randomized controlled trial

Fig. 2

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve of the base-case analysis, assessing the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. The analysis was controlled for baseline costs. The lines per treatment indicate the probability (y-axis), i.e., the proportion of replications this treatment has the highest net monetary benefit given various levels of willingness to pay (x-axis). At those willingness-to-pay levels where ESM-I has the higher probability compared with the other two treatments (summing up to 100%), ESM-I is the most cost-effective option. TAU = treatment as usual (control group); PSEUDO = pseudo-intervention group; ESM-I = ESM-intervention group

Back to article page

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us