Skip to main content

Table 4 Psychometric properties of the Arabic CAM-ICU according to gender

From: Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU)

Property

CAM-ICU by nurse

(n = 56)

CAM-ICU by intensivist

(n = 54)

Male

 Sensitivity (95%CI)

0.71 (0.55–0.86)

0.47 (0.30–0.64)

 Specificity (95%CI)

1.0 (1.0–1.0)

0.95 (0.85–1.0)

 Likelihood Ratio LR+ (95%CI)

Undefined*

9.4 (9.3–9.5)

 Likelihood Ratio LR- (95%CI)

0.29 (0.13–0.46)

0.56 (0.40–0.72)

 Positive predicted value (95%CI)

1.0 (1.0–1.0)

0.94 (0.83–1.0)

 Negative predicted value (95%CI)

0.69 (0.53–0.85)

0.51 (0.35–0.67)

 Pre-test probability

0.61

0.63

 Pre-test odds

1.55

1.70

 Post-test odds

Undefined**

16

 Post-test probability

Undefined***

0.94

 Delirium prevalence, CAM-ICU vs. psychiatrist clinical assessment

42.9% vs. 60.7%

31.5% vs. 63%

 Accuracy

82.1%

64.8%

Female

 Sensitivity (95%CI)

0.77 (0.62–0.91)

0.65 (0.49–0.81)

 Specificity (95%CI)

0.94 (0.84–1.0)

0.89 (0.74–1.0)

 Likelihood Ratio LR+ (95%CI)

13.8 (13.7–13.8)

5.82 (5.71–5.93)

 Likelihood Ratio LR- (95%CI)

0.25 (0.07–0.43)

0.40 (0.21–0.58)

 Positive predicted value (95%CI)

0.96 (0.89–1.0)

0.92 (0.81–1.0)

 Negative predicted value (95%CI)

0.68 (0.50–0.86)

0.57 (0.39–0.76)

 Pre-test probability

0.65

0.65

 Pre-test odds

1.89

1.89

 Post-test odds

26.0

11

 Post-test probability

0.96

0.92

 Delirium prevalence, CAM-ICU vs. psychiatrist clinical assessment

51.9% vs. 65.4%

46.2% vs. 65.4%

 Accuracy

82.7%

73.1%

  1. CAM-ICU Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit, CI confidence interval * Specificity value is 1; ** Likelihood Ratio is undefined; *** Post-test odd is undefined