Table 2 Results of active contact and follow-up interventions
| Â | Re-attempts | Death | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of patients with re-attempts/No. of patients in each group analysis | No. of re-attempts/No. of patients in each group analysis | No. of any-cause deaths/No. of patients in each group analysis | No. of suicidal deaths/No. of patients in each group analysis | |
Intensive care plus outreach | ||||
 Allard et al. 1992 [21] | • E: 22/63; C: 19/63 | • E: 60/63; C: 54/63 | – | • E: 3/76; C 1/74 |
 Van Heeringen et al. 1995 [52] | • E: 21/196; C: 34/195 | – | • 15 died in both groups | • E: 6/196; C: 7/195 |
 van der Sande et al. 1997 [51] | • E: 24/140; C: 20/134 | • E: 32/140; C: 31/134 | – | • E: 1/140; C: 2/134 |
 Morthorst et al. 2012 [44] | • E: 20/123; C: 13/120 (medically recorded) • E: 11/95; C: 13/74 (self-reported) | – | • E: 2/123; C: 1/120 | • E: 1/123; C: 0/120 |
 Kawanishi et al. 2014 [41]a | • E: 3/444; C: 16/445 in 1 mo • E: 7/430; C: 32/440 in 3 mo • E: 25/417; C: 51/428 in 6 mo • E: 43/397; C: 60/399 in 12 mo • E: 55/380; C: 71/385 in 18 mo | – | • E: 46/460; C: 42/454 during the overall study period | • E: 27/460; C: 30/454 during the overall study period |
 Hatcher et al. 2015 [39]a | • E: 47/327; C: 42/357 in 3 mo • E: 66/327; C: 73/357 in 12 mo • E: 86/737; C: 75/737 in 3 mo • E: 142/737; C: 135/737 in 12 mo | • E: 60/327; C: 62/357 in 3 mo • E: 129/327; C: 163/357 in 12 mo • E: 114/737; C: 108/737 in 3 mo • E: 256/737; C: 272/737 in 12 mo | • E: 2/327; C: 4/357 in 12 mo • E: 2/737; C: 4/737 in 12 mo | – |
Brief intervention and contact | ||||
• E: 66/863; C: 60/800 | – | • E: 11/872; C: 22/827 | • E: 2/872; C: 18/827 | |
 Mousavi et al., 2014 [45]a | • E: 1/69; C: 4/70 in 6 mo | – | – | – |
Letter or postcard | ||||
• E: 57/378; C: 68/394 in 12 mo • E: 80/378; C: 90/394 in 24 mo • E: 94/378; C: 107/394 in 60 mo | • E: 101/378; C: 192/394 in 12 mo • E: 145/378; C: 310/394 in 24 mo • E: 252/378; C: 484/394 in 60 mo | • E: 22/378; C: 22/394 in 60 mo | • E: 5/378; C: 6/394 in 60 mo | |
 Beautrais et al. 2010 [24] | • E: 39/153; C: 49/174 | • E: 87/153; C: 136/174 | – | – |
• E: 31/1043; C: 55/1070 in 12 mo • E: 62/997; C: 91/1004 in 24 mo | • E: 34/1043; C: 58/1070 in 12 mo | • E: 7/1150; C: 2/1150 in 12 mo • E: 8/1150; C: 5/1150 in 24 mo | • E: 8/1150; C: 4/1150 in 24 mo | |
Telephone | ||||
 Cedereke et al. 2002 [30] | • E: 14/83 vs. C: 15/89 | • E: 26/83 vs. C: 27/89 | – | • E: 1/107; C: 1/109 |
 Vaiva et al. 2006 [50] | • E1: 24/147; E2: 20/146; C: 59/312 | – | • 6 died in three groups | • E1: 0/147; E2: 1/146; C: 2/312 |
Composite of letter/postcard and telephone | ||||
 Kapur et al. 2013 [40] | • E: 11/33; C: 4/32 | • E: 41/33; C: 7/32 | • E: 1/33; C:0/32 | – |