Skip to main content

Table 5 Meta-analysis of antidepressant outcomes in all studies with either coil (k = 19 with 20 independent groups)

From: Antidepressant outcomes of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with F8-coil and deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) with H1-coil in major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Random-effects analyses

Primary outcome (depression severity); Hedges’ g (95% CI)

Secondary outcome (response rates); responders/total n (95% CI)

Secondary outcome (remission rates); remitters/total n (95% CI)

Pooled weighted effect

 Mean (95% CI); k; n

1.20 (.96–1.44); k = 20; n = 351

29% (20–39%); k = 15; n = 271 (66/271)

15% (10–22%); k = 12; n = 220 (28/220)

 Heterogeneity statistics

Q (df 19) = 49.12; p < .001*; I2 = 61%

Q (df 14) = 27.26; p = .018*; I2 = 49%

Q (df 11) = 12.19; p = .350; I2 = 10%

Publication bias analysis

 Fail-Safe N Rosenthal/Orwin

NRosenthal = 1372; NOrwin = 182

NRosenthal = 124; NOrwin = 25

NRosenthal = 187; NOrwin = 8

 Funnel plot symmetric?

No: k = 4 missing with small effect sizes

No: k = 2 missing with large response rates

No: k = 6 missing with large remission rates

 Mean effect (95% CI) adjusted for missing studies

1.05 (.78–1.32)

31% (22–42%)

23% (14–34%)

Subgroup analysis

Study design

 RCT

1.17 (.86–1.48); k = 9; n = 173

26% (13–47%); k = 6; n = 139 (29/139)

8% (4–14%); k = 4; n = 118 (9/118)

 Open-label

1.24 (.87–1.61); k = 11; n = 178

32% (23–42%); k = 9; n = 132 (37/132)

21% (14–31%); k = 8; n = 102 (19/102)

 RCT vs. open-label

Q (df 1) = .14, p = .712

Q (df 1) = 3.03, p = .082

Q (df 1) = 7.31, p = .007*

Therapy

 Add-on

1.20 (.89–1.50); k = 16; n = 231

31% (22–43%); k = 11; n = 145 (41/145)

20% (13–31%); k = 8; n = 94 (16/94)

 Monotherapy

1.21 (.98–1.44); k = 4; n = 120

23% (10–45%); k = 4; n = 126 (25/126)

11% (6–19%); k = 4; n = 126 (12/126)

 Add-on vs. monotherapy

Q (df 1) = 1.15, p = .283

Q (df 1) = 3.09, p = .079

Q (df 1) = 3.63, p = .057

Meta-regression predictors

 Mean age

b = −.05; p = .019*; R2 = 45%; k = 18

b = −.11; p = .123; R2 = 2%; k = 15

b = .06; p = .337; R2 = 23%; k = 12

 % female

b < .01; p = .642; R2 = 0%; k = 19

b < .01; p = .491; R2 = 0%; k = 15

b < −.01; p = .696; R2 = 0%; k = 12

 Mean illness duration

b < −.01; p = .681; R2 = 0%; k = 12

b = .05; p = .629; R2 = 0%; k = 7

b = −.04; p = .620; R2 = 0%; k = 7

 Mean onset age

b < .01; p = .913; R2 = 0%; k = 12

b = −.06; p = .327; R2 = 0%; k = 7

b = .01; p = .811; R2 = 0%; k = 7

 Stimuli/session

b < .01; p = .415; R2 = 0%; k = 17

b < .01; p = .964; R2 = 0%; k = 13

b < −.01; p = .313; R2 = 25%; k = 11

 Trains/session

b < .01; p = .804; R2 = 0%; k = 17

b = −.03; p = .132; R2 = 32%; k = 13

b < −.01; p = .858; R2 = 0%; k = 10

 Intensity (%MT)

b = .02; p = .007*; R2 = 37%; k = 19

b < −.01; p = .897; R2 = 0%; k = 15

b = −.02; p = .087; R2 = 100%; k = 12

 Inter-train interval (s)

b = −.01; p = .102; R2 = 0%; k = 17

b = −.02; p = .234; R2 = 0%; k = 12

b < .01; p = .996; R2 = 0%; k = 10

  1. The overall analyses and meta-regressions were conducted using the random-effects model. The subgroup analyses were conducted using the mixed-effects model. The Q-statistic has two functions: 1) a test for heterogeneity among the effect sizes, 2) a test for differences in effect sizes in subgroup analyses
  2. Abbreviations: b unstandardised weighted regression coefficient, CI 95% confidence interval, df degrees of freedom, Hedges’ g (effect size) standardised paired difference in means corrected for the sample size, k number of studies, n sample size, %MT percent of the resting motor threshold, RCT double-blind randomised-controlled trial with an inactive sham group
  3. *ptwo-tailed < .05