Table 4 Adequacy, quality and perceived benefit of care for treatment in recent episode
From: The psychosis treatment gap and its consequences in rural Ethiopia
Service characteristic | Service type | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biomedical | FTH | ||||
N | Percent | N | Percent | ||
Adequacy of care (Biomedical = 109)a | Inadequate treatment | 75 | 68.8 | – | – |
bMinimally Adequate | 34 | 31.2 | – | – | |
Perceived benefit (N=Biomedical = 112) (N=Holy water = 149) | Complete improvement | 37 | 33.0 | 49 | 32.9 |
Some improvement | 63 | 56.3 | 76 | 51.0 | |
No improvement | 12 | 10.7 | 23 | 15.4 | |
Harm | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.7 | |
Satisfaction in care (measuring quality) Biomedical (111) (FTH = 150) | Very satisfied | 34 | 25.5 | 21 | 14.0 |
Satisfied | 46 | 43.0 | 52 | 34.7 | |
Neutral | 21 | 18.8 | 32 | 21.3 | |
Dissatisfied | 7 | 8.1 | 32 | 21.3 | |
Very dissatisfied | 3 | 4.7 | 13 | 8.7 | |