Peer Review reports
From: The validity and reliability of the PHQ-9 in screening for post-stroke depression
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Jun 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Aug 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 6 Aug 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 3 Nov 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Piyapat Dajpratham |
| 9 Dec 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 19 Jan 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 28 Feb 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Piyapat Dajpratham |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 3 Nov 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 Apr 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 19 May 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Piyapat Dajpratham |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 19 May 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 May 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Jun 2020 | Article published | 10.1186/s12888-020-02699-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.